He seemed to feel that religion as it was at the time he was
speaking was dying a slow miserable death because as an institution, it failed
to recognize the divinity of all individuals granted by God and rather chose to
separate man from divinity. He
also thought that a world without faith is destined for failure.
I found it interesting the wide
ranging references in this text. Jesus,
“The French”, “The Greeks” and “The Egyptians, Moses, Zeno and Zoroaster, the
Puritans, St. Paul, George Fox or “Swedenborg”.
Its clear that based on where he was and his audience that
he was trying to attract attention by issuing a what must have been a radical
call to action. He is using a bold and exciting (read: controversial) sermon to address future
and current preachers. In this
sermon, he does to them exactly what he challenges them to do for/to their
congregants. He wants them to
challenge them to recognize their own value.
After bashing preaching for the first time, he backs off and
capitulating that some good-hearted men can get something out of even bad
preaching. Aside from that one
exception, he doesn’t seem to defend himself at all. It’s almost like he assumes he’s talking to a crowd open to
his thoughts.
He’s looking for a “new teacher”. Wow.
I loved this reading.
I found myself identifying, not so much with his “death of religion”
idea, but more with his positioning of humanity in line with, or part of
divinity.
No comments:
Post a Comment