The gist here is that that there is nothing to atone for –
or that atonement comes from God – God is the one that needs to get right with
humanity, if anyone does. A
kind and loving God, one kind enough to create us would not put us in a state
of persistent punishment.
Ballou relies heavily on scripture
and appears to be an expert at it. He is clearly railing against the top-down
religion and thinks his version of Christianity is valuable to the reader. He very much seems to be trying to
convert or convince the reader to make religious changes. I’m assuming that he would assume that
these ground-up changes would have implications on the church.
The whole book seems to be covered in “yea, but’s”. He’s constantly going back to
then-current thought to correct it, so I’m supposing that he was anticipating
the arguments against him [or that he’d already heard them by the time he wrote
this].
Sometimes when I read this, I get the feeling that he was
freeing his soul. He was working out his thoughts – honing his argument
maybe. I often get the feeling
that this is very private, that he may have been “writing to himself” and then
later maybe decided to publish it.
No comments:
Post a Comment